Phase 4 operator platform

Produce the Phase 4 gap register and exit audit — severity-tiered (P0–P3), track-by-track verification, ADR fidelity table, and sign-off checklist with zero open P0s.

Milestone 4.E.3 — Phase 4 Exit Audit

Status: Planned
Goal: Track E — Exit Gate
Phase: 4 — Operator Platform & Multi-Provider
Estimated effort: 1 day
Track: Track E — Exit Gate


Why This Milestone Exists

Every prior phase's real completion evidence lived in a dedicated exit-audit artifact. Phase 4 adds a new human-facing attack surface (dashboard, multi-provider credentials) plus a second live upstream provider — it needs the same rigor as Phase 1's audit, not a lighter one.


Exit Criteria (10-point sign-off)

  1. Second live LLM provider (Anthropic) passes same test depth as OpenAI
  2. Registry.For(model) resolves both providers with zero handler/middleware changes
  3. Circuit breaker and opt-in fallback verified via 4.E.2's fault-injection suite
  4. Redis Lua hierarchical rate limiting passes concurrency over-admission test (zero tolerance)
  5. Dashboard E2E suite (4.E.1) green in CI, required on main
  6. Zero axe-core serious/critical accessibility violations
  7. Management API OpenAPI spec consumed by dashboard client with zero manual type overrides
  8. All Phase 1–3.5 regression suites green with 2 providers registered
  9. Phase 4 gap register published with zero open P0 gaps
  10. CURRENT_STATE.mdx and roadmap snapshot updated

Orientation (indicative)

Named paths, package layouts, libraries, schemas, env vars, and commands anywhere on this page are rough sketches for orientation — inspiration and a baseline, not a required change list.

During implementation, expect to:

  • open the live tree and follow existing patterns before inventing new ones
  • research current constraints (latency, tenancy, deploy shape, libraries) more deeply than this page can
  • advance the design beyond the sketch where measurement or code reality says so
  • land work in different filenames, merged packages, deferred docs, or new surfaces when the situation calls for it

Prefer outcomes over matching any particular file tree or command sequence.

Areas that may be involved (situational — not a checklist):

  • Operator dashboard
  • Provider abstraction / adapters
  • Evaluation / benchmarks

Success signals

Outcome-oriented signals that the milestone is in good shape. Exact filenames, package layouts, and commands may differ from any sketches above.

  • Gap register published using Phase 1's severity table format (P0–P3)
  • ADR fidelity table for every ADR touched in Phase 4
  • Zero open P0 gaps at sign-off
  • current-state.mdx updated to reflect Phase 4 completion

Prerequisites

  • All Track A–D milestones complete
  • Milestones 4.E.1 and 4.E.2 passing in CI
Edit on GitHub

Last updated on

On this page

0%